[escepticos] Re: 2-0

[Carlos Ungil]

Hola, hola.

On 30/11/2009, at 22:17, Pedro J. Hdez wrote:
> Afortunadamente Mombiot que suele ser un tipo muy informado se
> adelantó algo a los acontecimientos. Los negacionistas están sacando
> partido de frases sacadas de contexto, pero la gente de CRU se está
> def[end]iendo bien.

Cito a Monbiot, a quien lees y respetas:

Yes, the messages were obtained illegally. Yes, all of us say things in emails that would be excruciating if made public. Yes, some of the comments have been taken out of context. But there are some messages that require no spin to make them look bad. There appears to be evidence here of attempts to prevent scientific data from being released, and even to destroy material that was subject to a freedom of information request.

Worse still, some of the emails suggest efforts to prevent the publication of work by climate sceptics, or to keep it out of a report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. I believe that the head of the unit, Phil Jones, should now resign. Some of the data discussed in the emails should be re-analysed.

¿Tiene razon Monbiot, y "he has to go, and the longer he leaves it, the worse it will get" o hace bien Jones en defenderse?

Chau,

Carlitos